Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Reopening of assessment was invalidated for lack of tangible material and the AO's independent application of mind; the notice under section 147/148 rested on 'borrowed satisfaction' from the investigation wing without requisite nexus or reasoned inference of escapement and therefore failed the four essential ingredients for reopening. On merits, share application monies treated as unexplained cash credits under section 68 were deleted: the assessee produced confirmations, bank statements and investors' audited accounts and sought summonses, and the Tribunal found the evidentiary onus discharged despite limited third party noncompliance.
Reopening of assessment was invalidated for lack of tangible material and the AO's independent application of mind; the notice under section 147/148 rested on 'borrowed satisfaction' from the investigation wing without requisite nexus or reasoned inference of escapement and therefore failed the four essential ingredients for reopening. On merits, share application monies treated as unexplained cash credits under section 68 were deleted: the assessee produced confirmations, bank statements and investors' audited accounts and sought summonses, and the Tribunal found the evidentiary onus discharged despite limited third party noncompliance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.