Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
Section 80P deduction covers Souharda credit societies, including qualifying surplus-deposit interest, subject to member KYC verification for cash dep...
Rejection of an IGST refund was set aside because the authority failed to apply its mind and breached principles of natural justice by not addressing the petitioner's contentions and contractual arrangements on whether the services were exports or intermediary services; the Court identified need to examine agreements and relevant precedents/circulars and directed remand for de novo consideration after hearing the parties. Outcome: the impugned order was quashed and the matter returned for fresh determination of the export-versus-intermediary question with all contentions open and a three-month timeline for decision.
Rejection of an IGST refund was set aside because the authority failed to apply its mind and breached principles of natural justice by not addressing the petitioner's contentions and contractual arrangements on whether the services were exports or intermediary services; the Court identified need to examine agreements and relevant precedents/circulars and directed remand for de novo consideration after hearing the parties. Outcome: the impugned order was quashed and the matter returned for fresh determination of the export-versus-intermediary question with all contentions open and a three-month timeline for decision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
