<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Export of services classification requires fresh adjudication when intermediary status and procedural fairness were not properly addressed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97632</link>
    <description>Rejection of an IGST refund was set aside because the authority failed to apply its mind and breached principles of natural justice by not addressing the petitioner&#039;s contentions and contractual arrangements on whether the services were exports or intermediary services; the Court identified need to examine agreements and relevant precedents/circulars and directed remand for de novo consideration after hearing the parties. Outcome: the impugned order was quashed and the matter returned for fresh determination of the export-versus-intermediary question with all contentions open and a three-month timeline for decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 08:33:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 08:33:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890050" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Export of services classification requires fresh adjudication when intermediary status and procedural fairness were not properly addressed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97632</link>
      <description>Rejection of an IGST refund was set aside because the authority failed to apply its mind and breached principles of natural justice by not addressing the petitioner&#039;s contentions and contractual arrangements on whether the services were exports or intermediary services; the Court identified need to examine agreements and relevant precedents/circulars and directed remand for de novo consideration after hearing the parties. Outcome: the impugned order was quashed and the matter returned for fresh determination of the export-versus-intermediary question with all contentions open and a three-month timeline for decision.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 08:33:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>