Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Allowability under section 43B was examined in relation to claimed royalty payments shown as book entries; the Tribunal held that the question turns on whether sums were actually paid and found that the appellate authorities did not verify records proving prior estimated royalty deposits and subsequent adjustments. The Tribunal directed remand to the assessing officer to examine state assessment orders, bank/payment records and related documentary evidence, afford the assessee an opportunity of hearing, and pass a fresh decision after factual verification; appeal allowed for statistical purposes.
Allowability under section 43B was examined in relation to claimed royalty payments shown as book entries; the Tribunal held that the question turns on whether sums were actually paid and found that the appellate authorities did not verify records proving prior estimated royalty deposits and subsequent adjustments. The Tribunal directed remand to the assessing officer to examine state assessment orders, bank/payment records and related documentary evidence, afford the assessee an opportunity of hearing, and pass a fresh decision after factual verification; appeal allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.