Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether amounts adjusted against excess royalty previously paid to the State (shown as negative liability on final determination) qualify as "actual payment" for the purpose of claiming deduction under section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The authorities below accepted that certain sums were paid through banking channels while treating remaining amounts as mere book adjustments against receivables arising from prior excess royalty payments. The appellate record before the Tribunal included orders of the State Mineral Superintendent showing final determination of liability and instances of negative balances reflecting excess pre-payments. The lower authorities and CPC did not verify whether the initial estimated payments, held by the State, effectively amounted to payments extinguishing liability once final determinations were made. In view of the foregoing factual materials and absence of adequate verification by the Assessing Officer and CIT(A), the issue of whether the adjustments represent actual payments cannot be conclusively resolved on the present record and requires fresh examination and opportunity of hearing.
Conclusion: The matter is remitted to the Assessing Officer for detailed verification of records and factual determination whether the adjustments represent actual payments qualifying under section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961; appeal is allowed for statistical purposes and in favour of the assessee.