Admission of additional evidence under remand rules must await a meaningful remand report; failure to do so breaches natural justice and mandates rema...
Export Obligation Discharge Certificates for EPCG compliance cannot be questioned by Customs unless DGFT adjudicates and cancels them, so demands quas...
Allowability under section 43B was examined in relation to claimed royalty payments shown as book entries; the Tribunal held that the question turns on whether sums were actually paid and found that the appellate authorities did not verify records proving prior estimated royalty deposits and subsequent adjustments. The Tribunal directed remand to the assessing officer to examine state assessment orders, bank/payment records and related documentary evidence, afford the assessee an opportunity of hearing, and pass a fresh decision after factual verification; appeal allowed for statistical purposes.
Allowability under section 43B was examined in relation to claimed royalty payments shown as book entries; the Tribunal held that the question turns on whether sums were actually paid and found that the appellate authorities did not verify records proving prior estimated royalty deposits and subsequent adjustments. The Tribunal directed remand to the assessing officer to examine state assessment orders, bank/payment records and related documentary evidence, afford the assessee an opportunity of hearing, and pass a fresh decision after factual verification; appeal allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.