Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Allowability under section 43B was examined in relation to claimed royalty payments shown as book entries; the Tribunal held that the question turns on whether sums were actually paid and found that the appellate authorities did not verify records proving prior estimated royalty deposits and subsequent adjustments. The Tribunal directed remand to the assessing officer to examine state assessment orders, bank/payment records and related documentary evidence, afford the assessee an opportunity of hearing, and pass a fresh decision after factual verification; appeal allowed for statistical purposes.
Allowability under section 43B was examined in relation to claimed royalty payments shown as book entries; the Tribunal held that the question turns on whether sums were actually paid and found that the appellate authorities did not verify records proving prior estimated royalty deposits and subsequent adjustments. The Tribunal directed remand to the assessing officer to examine state assessment orders, bank/payment records and related documentary evidence, afford the assessee an opportunity of hearing, and pass a fresh decision after factual verification; appeal allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.