Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The tribunal affirmed that cash deposits in the assessee's proprietorship bank accounts during the demonetisation period were treated as unexplained income where the assessee failed to respond to statutory notices or furnish any explanation or documents; on the basis of bank data the deposits were attributed to the assessee and taxed accordingly. Separately, the claimed current-year loss set off was disallowed because the assessee did not produce supporting details before the tax authorities or on appeal, leaving the claim unsubstantiated. All grounds of appeal were dismissed for lack of material and failure to furnish explanations or appear.
The tribunal affirmed that cash deposits in the assessee's proprietorship bank accounts during the demonetisation period were treated as unexplained income where the assessee failed to respond to statutory notices or furnish any explanation or documents; on the basis of bank data the deposits were attributed to the assessee and taxed accordingly. Separately, the claimed current-year loss set off was disallowed because the assessee did not produce supporting details before the tax authorities or on appeal, leaving the claim unsubstantiated. All grounds of appeal were dismissed for lack of material and failure to furnish explanations or appear.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.