Reversal of input tax credit in proportion to exempt supply: specificity of show-cause notice required; order set aside, fresh proceedings allowed wit...
Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
The article addresses valuation of share premium under s.56(2)(viib) and Rule 11UA, holding that a taxpayer may elect FMV by formulaic net asset route or by a valuer-certified Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method and that the Assessing Officer may scrutinise, challenge assumptions, obtain an independent valuation, but may not substitute a different valuation method than the one chosen by the assessee. Applying this, wholesale rejection of a DCF valuation and replacement with NAV was an excess of jurisdiction and the addition based on NAV was deleted, with the appeal allowed.
The article addresses valuation of share premium under s.56(2)(viib) and Rule 11UA, holding that a taxpayer may elect FMV by formulaic net asset route or by a valuer-certified Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method and that the Assessing Officer may scrutinise, challenge assumptions, obtain an independent valuation, but may not substitute a different valuation method than the one chosen by the assessee. Applying this, wholesale rejection of a DCF valuation and replacement with NAV was an excess of jurisdiction and the addition based on NAV was deleted, with the appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
