<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Valuation Method Choice under Rule 11UA bars AO from replacing taxpayer&#039;s DCF with NAV; addition deleted.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97531</link>
    <description>The article addresses valuation of share premium under s.56(2)(viib) and Rule 11UA, holding that a taxpayer may elect FMV by formulaic net asset route or by a valuer-certified Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method and that the Assessing Officer may scrutinise, challenge assumptions, obtain an independent valuation, but may not substitute a different valuation method than the one chosen by the assessee. Applying this, wholesale rejection of a DCF valuation and replacement with NAV was an excess of jurisdiction and the addition based on NAV was deleted, with the appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 08:51:27 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 08:51:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Valuation Method Choice under Rule 11UA bars AO from replacing taxpayer&#039;s DCF with NAV; addition deleted.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97531</link>
      <description>The article addresses valuation of share premium under s.56(2)(viib) and Rule 11UA, holding that a taxpayer may elect FMV by formulaic net asset route or by a valuer-certified Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method and that the Assessing Officer may scrutinise, challenge assumptions, obtain an independent valuation, but may not substitute a different valuation method than the one chosen by the assessee. Applying this, wholesale rejection of a DCF valuation and replacement with NAV was an excess of jurisdiction and the addition based on NAV was deleted, with the appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 08:51:27 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97531</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>