Penalty for estimation of income and disallowances for tax non-deduction clarified: estimation-based penalties not sustainable; additions without conc...
Managerial remuneration disallowance under s.40A(2)(b) challenged over alleged tax-avoidance; appellate decision restored deletion of addition for dir...
Classification of imported goods as electronic cigarette versus tobacco product reversed for lack of proof; order set aside for jurisdictional overrea...
The article addresses valuation of share premium under s.56(2)(viib) and Rule 11UA, holding that a taxpayer may elect FMV by formulaic net asset route or by a valuer-certified Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method and that the Assessing Officer may scrutinise, challenge assumptions, obtain an independent valuation, but may not substitute a different valuation method than the one chosen by the assessee. Applying this, wholesale rejection of a DCF valuation and replacement with NAV was an excess of jurisdiction and the addition based on NAV was deleted, with the appeal allowed.
The article addresses valuation of share premium under s.56(2)(viib) and Rule 11UA, holding that a taxpayer may elect FMV by formulaic net asset route or by a valuer-certified Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method and that the Assessing Officer may scrutinise, challenge assumptions, obtain an independent valuation, but may not substitute a different valuation method than the one chosen by the assessee. Applying this, wholesale rejection of a DCF valuation and replacement with NAV was an excess of jurisdiction and the addition based on NAV was deleted, with the appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
