Validity of faceless assessment procedure challenged for jurisdictional AO intervention mid-remand, resulting in quashing of assessment for procedural...
Inventory write-off and fraudulent/wrongful trading allegations in corporate insolvency led to director liability principles applied and appeal dismis...
The article addresses valuation of share premium under s.56(2)(viib) and Rule 11UA, holding that a taxpayer may elect FMV by formulaic net asset route or by a valuer-certified Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method and that the Assessing Officer may scrutinise, challenge assumptions, obtain an independent valuation, but may not substitute a different valuation method than the one chosen by the assessee. Applying this, wholesale rejection of a DCF valuation and replacement with NAV was an excess of jurisdiction and the addition based on NAV was deleted, with the appeal allowed.
The article addresses valuation of share premium under s.56(2)(viib) and Rule 11UA, holding that a taxpayer may elect FMV by formulaic net asset route or by a valuer-certified Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method and that the Assessing Officer may scrutinise, challenge assumptions, obtain an independent valuation, but may not substitute a different valuation method than the one chosen by the assessee. Applying this, wholesale rejection of a DCF valuation and replacement with NAV was an excess of jurisdiction and the addition based on NAV was deleted, with the appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
