Assessment time-barred u/s 153 due to missing competent-authority reference for Singapore exchange of information; assessment disallowed as barred by ...
Imported menthol-scented sweet supari classification dispute: seizure quashed, release for home consumption subject to duty bond; bank guarantee refus...
CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
The note addresses whether limitation for passing a final assessment under section 144C(13) must be measured solely by section 144C or with reference to section 153; applying the reasoning of prior precedents it concludes the limitation period is to be determined read with section 153, making the final assessment order u/s 143(3) r.w.s.144C(13) for AY 2020-21 time barred. The operative effect is quashing of that final assessment order. Parties are granted liberty to revive the appeal on merits if the Supreme Court Larger Bench alters the law on this limitation issue.
The note addresses whether limitation for passing a final assessment under section 144C(13) must be measured solely by section 144C or with reference to section 153; applying the reasoning of prior precedents it concludes the limitation period is to be determined read with section 153, making the final assessment order u/s 143(3) r.w.s.144C(13) for AY 2020-21 time barred. The operative effect is quashing of that final assessment order. Parties are granted liberty to revive the appeal on merits if the Supreme Court Larger Bench alters the law on this limitation issue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
