Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Continuing offence of money-laundering: discharge set aside and proceedings reinstated where laundering continued after inclusion of predicate offence...
Issue concerned eligibility for deduction under Section 80-IC where assessee manufactured some items listed in the Fourteenth Schedule but not those in the Thirteenth Schedule. Tribunal rejected the Revenue's contention that manufacture of Fourteenth Schedule items alone invoked Section 80-IC(2)(b); instead eligibility was determined by location in a notified eligible area and commencement of production within the specified period. Result: assessee entitled to benefit under Section 80-IC(2)(a)(ii) on satisfying location and commencement criteria, not merely by producing certain Fourteenth Schedule goods.
Issue concerned eligibility for deduction under Section 80-IC where assessee manufactured some items listed in the Fourteenth Schedule but not those in the Thirteenth Schedule. Tribunal rejected the Revenue's contention that manufacture of Fourteenth Schedule items alone invoked Section 80-IC(2)(b); instead eligibility was determined by location in a notified eligible area and commencement of production within the specified period. Result: assessee entitled to benefit under Section 80-IC(2)(a)(ii) on satisfying location and commencement criteria, not merely by producing certain Fourteenth Schedule goods.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
