Depreciation and routine compliance expenses disallowance did not prove inaccurate particulars or misreporting; penalty sustained only on foreign trav...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3481 to 3500 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Issue concerned eligibility for deduction under Section 80-IC where assessee manufactured some items listed in the Fourteenth Schedule but not those in the Thirteenth Schedule. Tribunal rejected the Revenue's contention that manufacture of Fourteenth Schedule items alone invoked Section 80-IC(2)(b); instead eligibility was determined by location in a notified eligible area and commencement of production within the specified period. Result: assessee entitled to benefit under Section 80-IC(2)(a)(ii) on satisfying location and commencement criteria, not merely by producing certain Fourteenth Schedule goods.
Issue concerned eligibility for deduction under Section 80-IC where assessee manufactured some items listed in the Fourteenth Schedule but not those in the Thirteenth Schedule. Tribunal rejected the Revenue's contention that manufacture of Fourteenth Schedule items alone invoked Section 80-IC(2)(b); instead eligibility was determined by location in a notified eligible area and commencement of production within the specified period. Result: assessee entitled to benefit under Section 80-IC(2)(a)(ii) on satisfying location and commencement criteria, not merely by producing certain Fourteenth Schedule goods.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
