Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
Estimation of profit element in non-genuine purchases: the Tribunal held that the CIT(A) mechanically followed an earlier ITAT direction limiting disallowance without independently verifying factual parity between years or the effect of later binding precedents, and that subsequent authority criticises fixed-rate profit estimates where the assessee fails to prove genuineness. The impugned restriction was set aside and the matter remitted to the CIT(A) to re-adjudicate after affording the assessee a hearing, to apply relevant binding precedents and record a reasoned finding. The Revenue's appeal was allowed for statistical purposes and remand ordered.
Estimation of profit element in non-genuine purchases: the Tribunal held that the CIT(A) mechanically followed an earlier ITAT direction limiting disallowance without independently verifying factual parity between years or the effect of later binding precedents, and that subsequent authority criticises fixed-rate profit estimates where the assessee fails to prove genuineness. The impugned restriction was set aside and the matter remitted to the CIT(A) to re-adjudicate after affording the assessee a hearing, to apply relevant binding precedents and record a reasoned finding. The Revenue's appeal was allowed for statistical purposes and remand ordered.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.