Revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 upheld; faceless assessments subject to revision when AO fails requisite enquiries, remitted for fresh asse...
Limited scope of processing under section 143(1): enhancement without show cause is unsustainable; remand for residency, taxation and TDS verification...
Valuation of mixed used/unused imported toolroom parts must follow the sequential methodology of the Customs Valuation Rules, resorting to the residual method only if Rules 3-8 cannot be applied; a Chartered Engineer certificate and unverified contemporaneous import data cannot alone justify rejection of the transaction value, and redetermination based solely on such a certificate is unlawful. Where the declared description matched the CE certificate and first check examination occurred, findings of intentional mis declaration were unsupported; consequential confiscation, redemption fine and penalty were set aside and reassessment was held unsustainable.
Valuation of mixed used/unused imported toolroom parts must follow the sequential methodology of the Customs Valuation Rules, resorting to the residual method only if Rules 3-8 cannot be applied; a Chartered Engineer certificate and unverified contemporaneous import data cannot alone justify rejection of the transaction value, and redetermination based solely on such a certificate is unlawful. Where the declared description matched the CE certificate and first check examination occurred, findings of intentional mis declaration were unsupported; consequential confiscation, redemption fine and penalty were set aside and reassessment was held unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.