<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Customs Valuation Rule sequence: Chartered Engineer certificate alone cannot justify rejection of transaction value; reassessment set aside.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97366</link>
    <description>Valuation of mixed used/unused imported toolroom parts must follow the sequential methodology of the Customs Valuation Rules, resorting to the residual method only if Rules 3-8 cannot be applied; a Chartered Engineer certificate and unverified contemporaneous import data cannot alone justify rejection of the transaction value, and redetermination based solely on such a certificate is unlawful. Where the declared description matched the CE certificate and first check examination occurred, findings of intentional mis declaration were unsupported; consequential confiscation, redemption fine and penalty were set aside and reassessment was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 08:42:40 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 08:42:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Customs Valuation Rule sequence: Chartered Engineer certificate alone cannot justify rejection of transaction value; reassessment set aside.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97366</link>
      <description>Valuation of mixed used/unused imported toolroom parts must follow the sequential methodology of the Customs Valuation Rules, resorting to the residual method only if Rules 3-8 cannot be applied; a Chartered Engineer certificate and unverified contemporaneous import data cannot alone justify rejection of the transaction value, and redetermination based solely on such a certificate is unlawful. Where the declared description matched the CE certificate and first check examination occurred, findings of intentional mis declaration were unsupported; consequential confiscation, redemption fine and penalty were set aside and reassessment was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 08:42:40 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97366</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>