Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
Class actions under Section 245 are maintainable in respect of transactions pleaded as past, continuing or systematically orchestrated where concealment prevents shareholder knowledge or authorisation; the Tribunal held such allegations justify admission. The Tribunal construed Section 245(1)(g) and residuary clause (h) to permit reliefs against the company, its directors and third parties, including damages or compensation aimed at restoring the company and consequential shareholder loss. The NCLT properly applied Section 245(4) factors (good faith and locus to pursue) and relevant NCLT Rules on threshold shareholding, joinder impracticability and common questions, and admission on the prima facie record was upheld.
Class actions under Section 245 are maintainable in respect of transactions pleaded as past, continuing or systematically orchestrated where concealment prevents shareholder knowledge or authorisation; the Tribunal held such allegations justify admission. The Tribunal construed Section 245(1)(g) and residuary clause (h) to permit reliefs against the company, its directors and third parties, including damages or compensation aimed at restoring the company and consequential shareholder loss. The NCLT properly applied Section 245(4) factors (good faith and locus to pursue) and relevant NCLT Rules on threshold shareholding, joinder impracticability and common questions, and admission on the prima facie record was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
