Expenses for overseas film shooting treated as services availed outside India, so no reverse charge service tax liability; cenvat reversals and penalt...
Electricity consumptionbased clandestine production estimates under the repealed Central Excise Act found insufficient; demand quashed and appeals all...
Reassessment notice under section 148 was sustained because the Assessing Officer had independent information forming reasons to believe that income had escaped assessment by a wrong claim of deduction; accordingly reassessment proceedings were validly initiated. On the substantive claim under section 80IB(10), the notional entry arising from a joint venture accounting valuation did not represent real income in the relevant year as no approved housing project activity, sales or completion occurred; applying the real income principle and to avoid double taxation, the disallowance of the deduction was deleted and the related additions were reversed.
Reassessment notice under section 148 was sustained because the Assessing Officer had independent information forming reasons to believe that income had escaped assessment by a wrong claim of deduction; accordingly reassessment proceedings were validly initiated. On the substantive claim under section 80IB(10), the notional entry arising from a joint venture accounting valuation did not represent real income in the relevant year as no approved housing project activity, sales or completion occurred; applying the real income principle and to avoid double taxation, the disallowance of the deduction was deleted and the related additions were reversed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
