<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reassessment validity upheld where AO had reasons to believe escaped income, but notional housing income excluded as non real.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97334</link>
    <description>Reassessment notice under section 148 was sustained because the Assessing Officer had independent information forming reasons to believe that income had escaped assessment by a wrong claim of deduction; accordingly reassessment proceedings were validly initiated. On the substantive claim under section 80IB(10), the notional entry arising from a joint venture accounting valuation did not represent real income in the relevant year as no approved housing project activity, sales or completion occurred; applying the real income principle and to avoid double taxation, the disallowance of the deduction was deleted and the related additions were reversed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 15:40:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 15:40:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reassessment validity upheld where AO had reasons to believe escaped income, but notional housing income excluded as non real.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97334</link>
      <description>Reassessment notice under section 148 was sustained because the Assessing Officer had independent information forming reasons to believe that income had escaped assessment by a wrong claim of deduction; accordingly reassessment proceedings were validly initiated. On the substantive claim under section 80IB(10), the notional entry arising from a joint venture accounting valuation did not represent real income in the relevant year as no approved housing project activity, sales or completion occurred; applying the real income principle and to avoid double taxation, the disallowance of the deduction was deleted and the related additions were reversed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 15:40:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>