Reopening Assessments invalid where satisfaction and jurisdictional approval are absent for third party seized material, leading to quashing of assess...
Benami property exclusion from the insolvency estate: Benami Act proceedings preclude IBC tribunals from reopening attachments or treating such assets...
Exclusion of limitation period: pandemic suspension plus debtor acknowledgement can extend limitation, requiring fresh factfinding on guarantee invoca...
The article addresses penalty proceedings under section 271D for alleged contravention of section 269SS: tribunals have held that cash received as part of sale consideration expressly recorded in a registered sale deed may fall outside the prohibition on specified cash receipts, and penalty cannot stand where the Assessing Officer has not recorded satisfaction in assessment proceedings. It further notes limitation rulings applying the TOLA extension as making show-cause notices issued well after the extended reasonable period time-barred; on those grounds the impugned penalty was deleted and the assessee's appeal allowed.
The article addresses penalty proceedings under section 271D for alleged contravention of section 269SS: tribunals have held that cash received as part of sale consideration expressly recorded in a registered sale deed may fall outside the prohibition on specified cash receipts, and penalty cannot stand where the Assessing Officer has not recorded satisfaction in assessment proceedings. It further notes limitation rulings applying the TOLA extension as making show-cause notices issued well after the extended reasonable period time-barred; on those grounds the impugned penalty was deleted and the assessee's appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.