Specified sum under section 269SS: cash paid on registered sale deed not covered, so 271D penalty cannot be sustained.

The note addresses whether cash received at execution and registration of a sale deed qualifies as a "specified sum" under section 269SS and whether penalties under section 271D may be imposed without recorded satisfaction or within limitation. It concludes that cash paid as part of a completed, registered sale is outside the intended scope of "specified sum," so section 271D penalty does not apply on those facts, and that penalty proceedings lacking recorded satisfaction in assessment-related proceedings or initiated beyond permissible/ reasonable time under limitation rules are invalid and liable to be quashed.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether cash received as part of sale consideration at the time of execution and registration of a sale deed falls within the scope of "specified sum" under section 269SS of the Income-tax Act, 1961 attracting penalty under section 271D; (ii) Whether penalty under section 271D can be validly imposed in the absence of recorded satisfaction by the Assessing Officer in assessment proceedings or other proceedings under the Act and whether initiation of penalty proceedings complied with limitation under section 275.

Issue (i): Whether cash received as sale consideration at registration of the sale deed is a "specified sum" under section 269SS attracting penalty under section 271D.

Analysis: The Amendment to section 269SS (w.e.f. 01.06.2015) introduced the term "specified sum". Legislative material including the Budget speech, Memorandum to the Finance Bill, and CBDT Circular No.19 of 2015 explain the amendment's aim to curb acceptance of cash advances in immovable property transactions. Coordinate Tribunal authority (ITA, Chennai) has interpreted the amendment as intended to target advances and not completed sale transactions where payment is made at registration before the Sub-Registrar.

Conclusion: In favour of the assessee. Cash received as part of the sale consideration at the time of execution and registration of the sale deed does not attract section 269SS and consequent penalty under section 271D on the facts of this case.

Issue (ii): Whether penalty under section 271D can be imposed without recorded satisfaction in assessment proceedings or other proceedings under the Act and whether the penalty initiation complied with limitation under section 275.

Analysis: Jurisprudence establishes that initiation of penalty under chapter XXI presupposes existence of assessment proceedings or proceedings arising from an assessment order and that satisfaction by the Assessing Officer must be recorded for initiating penalty under provisions pari materia to section 271D. Section 275 prescribes limitation rules for penalty proceedings. Coordinate Tribunal and Supreme Court authorities have held that absence of recorded satisfaction and absence of assessment proceedings render penalty proceedings invalid; CBDT Circular No.9/2016 and relevant authorities support application of limitation principles and requirement of reasonable time for initiation.

Conclusion: In favour of the assessee. Penalty under section 271D imposed without recorded satisfaction in assessment or related proceedings and where initiation is beyond the permissible/ reasonable time is not valid and is quashed.

Final Conclusion: The appeals are allowed and the penalty orders under section 271D are deleted; the decision results in relief to the assessee on both the applicability of section 269SS to the facts and on the jurisdictional and limitation defects in imposing penalty.

Ratio Decidendi: Penalty under section 271D cannot be sustained where (a) the cash payment is part of a completed sale made and acknowledged at the time of registered sale deed (not an advance) and thus outside the intended scope of "specified sum" under section 269SS, and (b) there is no recorded satisfaction in assessment or related proceedings as a precondition for initiating penalty proceedings and/or the proceedings are time-barred under section 275.

---