Recorded satisfaction as prerequisite for penalty: penalty invalid where no assessment proceedings or satisfaction were recorded.

Penalty under Section 271D cannot be validly imposed in the absence of prior assessment proceedings or other proceedings under the Act and without the Assessing Officer recording satisfaction; penalty proceedings under Sections 271D/271E are in pari materia and presuppose existence of assessment-related proceedings, and limitation principles for penalty orders apply. Authorities and guidance cited require recording of satisfaction in the original assessment order (or existence of relevant proceedings) before initiating penalty; where those preconditions are absent, issuance of show-cause/penalty notice and the penalty are invalid and must be quashed.

---

---

Issues: Whether penalty under Section 271D of the Income-tax Act, 1961 levied for alleged contravention of Section 269SS of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is valid where no assessment proceedings or other proceedings under the Act were pending and no satisfaction was recorded by the Assessing Officer in assessment proceedings or any other proceedings.

Analysis: The legal framework includes the provisions of Section 269SS and Section 271D of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the requirement, as explained by precedent, that penalty proceedings under Sections 271D/271E are in pari materia and presuppose assessment proceedings or proceedings arising from an assessment order. Section 275 prescribes limitation principles applicable to penalty orders under Chapter XXI. The CBDT Circular No. 9/2016 dated 26.04.2016 and authoritative decisions, including the Supreme Court's ruling in Jai Laxmi Rice Mills and the jurisdictional High Court decision in Srinivas Reddy Reddappagari, establish that recording of satisfaction by the Assessing Officer in the original assessment order (or existence of assessment/relevant proceedings) is a mandatory precondition for initiation of penalty under Sections 271D/271E. Coordinate Tribunal decisions applying these principles have held that issuance of show cause/penalty notices in the absence of any assessment proceedings and without recorded satisfaction renders the penalty invalid. Applying these authorities to the present facts, there were no assessment proceedings or other proceedings under the Act and no recorded satisfaction by the Assessing Officer prior to initiation of penalty; consequently, the statutory preconditions for valid imposition of penalty under Section 271D were not satisfied.

Conclusion: Penalty under Section 271D of the Income-tax Act, 1961 levied without existence of assessment proceedings or recorded satisfaction by the Assessing Officer is invalid; the penalty is quashed and the appeal is allowed in favour of the assessee.

---