Depreciation and routine compliance expenses disallowance did not prove inaccurate particulars or misreporting; penalty sustained only on foreign trav...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3481 to 3500 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The article addresses penalty proceedings under section 271D for alleged contravention of section 269SS: tribunals have held that cash received as part of sale consideration expressly recorded in a registered sale deed may fall outside the prohibition on specified cash receipts, and penalty cannot stand where the Assessing Officer has not recorded satisfaction in assessment proceedings. It further notes limitation rulings applying the TOLA extension as making show-cause notices issued well after the extended reasonable period time-barred; on those grounds the impugned penalty was deleted and the assessee's appeal allowed.
The article addresses penalty proceedings under section 271D for alleged contravention of section 269SS: tribunals have held that cash received as part of sale consideration expressly recorded in a registered sale deed may fall outside the prohibition on specified cash receipts, and penalty cannot stand where the Assessing Officer has not recorded satisfaction in assessment proceedings. It further notes limitation rulings applying the TOLA extension as making show-cause notices issued well after the extended reasonable period time-barred; on those grounds the impugned penalty was deleted and the assessee's appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
