Co-operative society's mandatory reserve and share capital fixed deposits with banks-interest treated as business income under 80P(2)(a)(iii) deductio...
Income tax reassessment reopening after four years on investigation tip, without s.147 proviso disclosure failure, struck down as borrowed satisfactio...
Maintainability of a writ under Article 226 is limited where an alternative statutory appeal exists and the impugned orders arise from rectification proceedings under Section 161 of the GST Act; the court found no pleaded illegality and noted the petitioner received personal hearing before rectification orders were passed, so disputed questions of fact and the availability of an appeal precluded exercise of extraordinary writ jurisdiction. Outcome: writ petition dismissed and petitioner left to pursue the statutory appellate remedy.
Maintainability of a writ under Article 226 is limited where an alternative statutory appeal exists and the impugned orders arise from rectification proceedings under Section 161 of the GST Act; the court found no pleaded illegality and noted the petitioner received personal hearing before rectification orders were passed, so disputed questions of fact and the availability of an appeal precluded exercise of extraordinary writ jurisdiction. Outcome: writ petition dismissed and petitioner left to pursue the statutory appellate remedy.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
