Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
Maintainability of a writ under Article 226 is limited where an alternative statutory appeal exists and the impugned orders arise from rectification proceedings under Section 161 of the GST Act; the court found no pleaded illegality and noted the petitioner received personal hearing before rectification orders were passed, so disputed questions of fact and the availability of an appeal precluded exercise of extraordinary writ jurisdiction. Outcome: writ petition dismissed and petitioner left to pursue the statutory appellate remedy.
Maintainability of a writ under Article 226 is limited where an alternative statutory appeal exists and the impugned orders arise from rectification proceedings under Section 161 of the GST Act; the court found no pleaded illegality and noted the petitioner received personal hearing before rectification orders were passed, so disputed questions of fact and the availability of an appeal precluded exercise of extraordinary writ jurisdiction. Outcome: writ petition dismissed and petitioner left to pursue the statutory appellate remedy.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
