Jurisdictional validity: notice issued by a non jurisdictional officer invalidates reassessment where no formal transfer or independent verification o...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5581 to 5600 of 96176 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Maintainability of a writ under Article 226 is limited where an alternative statutory appeal exists and the impugned orders arise from rectification proceedings under Section 161 of the GST Act; the court found no pleaded illegality and noted the petitioner received personal hearing before rectification orders were passed, so disputed questions of fact and the availability of an appeal precluded exercise of extraordinary writ jurisdiction. Outcome: writ petition dismissed and petitioner left to pursue the statutory appellate remedy.
Maintainability of a writ under Article 226 is limited where an alternative statutory appeal exists and the impugned orders arise from rectification proceedings under Section 161 of the GST Act; the court found no pleaded illegality and noted the petitioner received personal hearing before rectification orders were passed, so disputed questions of fact and the availability of an appeal precluded exercise of extraordinary writ jurisdiction. Outcome: writ petition dismissed and petitioner left to pursue the statutory appellate remedy.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
