Imported menthol-scented sweet supari classification dispute: seizure quashed, release for home consumption subject to duty bond; bank guarantee refus...
CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Assessee failed to establish eligibility for immunity under section 270AA(3) because no application in Form 68-online or manual-was produced or acknowledged; alleged technical glitch was unsubstantiated. The reasoning applies the requirement that an immunity application must be filed and evidenced, and that absence of Form 68 or acknowledgment supports a finding of under reporting. Consequent to these factual and evidentiary findings, penalty liability under section 270A was sustained and the appeal was dismissed.
Assessee failed to establish eligibility for immunity under section 270AA(3) because no application in Form 68-online or manual-was produced or acknowledged; alleged technical glitch was unsubstantiated. The reasoning applies the requirement that an immunity application must be filed and evidenced, and that absence of Form 68 or acknowledgment supports a finding of under reporting. Consequent to these factual and evidentiary findings, penalty liability under section 270A was sustained and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
