1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Penalty under section 270A upheld; immunity under section 270AA denied for lack of acknowledged Form 68 filing.</h1> Penalty under section 270A was sustained because the assessee failed to produce reliable documentary evidence of a valid, acknowledged Form No. 68 filing ... Penalty u/s. 270A - Eligibility of immunity u/s. 270AA(3) - allegation of under-reporting of income - no proof of an online or manual Form 68 - HELD THAT:- Assessee during the penalty proceedings u/s 270A has not produced any application before the AO related to the immunity application in Form 68 u/s. 270AA(3) of the Act. The contention of the ld. A.R. that there was a technical glitch at the relevant time was also not substantiated by any document produced before us at the time of hearing of this appeal. The contention of the AR is also not correct as the correspondence between FAO and JAO intents to state that the assessee failed to produce any application online or manual before the authorities and there was no order u/s. 270A(4) of the Act. The documents presented before the Bench are simply a document which does not contain Form No. 68 annexed to that and there is no acknowledgment to the same. Thus, the assessee has categorically under reported her income and liable for penalty u/s. 270A of the Act. Thus, the penalty order passed u/s. 270A is justifiable - Appeal of the assessee is dismissed. Issues: (i) Whether the penalty levied under section 270A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is justified for under-reporting of income for assessment year 2018-19; (ii) Whether the assessee is entitled to immunity from penalty under section 270AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by filing Form No. 68 or otherwise.Issue (i): Whether the penalty under section 270A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was rightly imposed for under-reporting of income.Analysis: The assessee did not file the return under section 139(1) and filed a return only after issuance of notice under section 148. The Assessing Officer computed under-reported income and tax, and levied penalty under section 270A read with section 274. The record shows absence of any contemporaneous production of an immunity application before the Assessing Officer during penalty proceedings. The assessee's submissions about subsequent filings and rectification under section 154 were examined, but the materials relied upon did not contain an acknowledgment or verification establishing an effective filing of immunity application on the ITBA portal. The assessee's contention of a technical glitch was not substantiated by documentary proof before the Tribunal.Conclusion: The penalty imposed under section 270A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is justified and sustainable; this issue is decided against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.Issue (ii): Whether the assessee is entitled to immunity from penalty under section 270AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by filing Form No. 68.Analysis: To obtain immunity under section 270AA, the assessee must file the application in the manner and within the time permitted and produce credible evidence of such filing. The record does not establish that Form No. 68 was validly filed and acknowledged online or that any order under section 270AA(4) was passed in favour of the assessee. The alleged manual filing and communications with departmental officers were not supported by documentary acknowledgment or dispositive orders proving compliance with statutory requirements for immunity.Conclusion: The assessee is not entitled to immunity under section 270AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961; this issue is decided against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.Final Conclusion: The Tribunal upholds the penalty under section 270A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and rejects the claim for immunity under section 270AA, resulting in dismissal of the assessee's appeal.Ratio Decidendi: Where the assessee fails to produce reliable documentary evidence of valid filing and acknowledgment of an immunity application under section 270AA, the claim for immunity cannot succeed and a penalty under section 270A may be sustained for under-reporting of income.