Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Continuing offence of money-laundering: discharge set aside and proceedings reinstated where laundering continued after inclusion of predicate offence...
Assessee failed to establish eligibility for immunity under section 270AA(3) because no application in Form 68-online or manual-was produced or acknowledged; alleged technical glitch was unsubstantiated. The reasoning applies the requirement that an immunity application must be filed and evidenced, and that absence of Form 68 or acknowledgment supports a finding of under reporting. Consequent to these factual and evidentiary findings, penalty liability under section 270A was sustained and the appeal was dismissed.
Assessee failed to establish eligibility for immunity under section 270AA(3) because no application in Form 68-online or manual-was produced or acknowledged; alleged technical glitch was unsubstantiated. The reasoning applies the requirement that an immunity application must be filed and evidenced, and that absence of Form 68 or acknowledgment supports a finding of under reporting. Consequent to these factual and evidentiary findings, penalty liability under section 270A was sustained and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.