Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Assessee failed to establish eligibility for immunity under section 270AA(3) because no application in Form 68-online or manual-was produced or acknowledged; alleged technical glitch was unsubstantiated. The reasoning applies the requirement that an immunity application must be filed and evidenced, and that absence of Form 68 or acknowledgment supports a finding of under reporting. Consequent to these factual and evidentiary findings, penalty liability under section 270A was sustained and the appeal was dismissed.
Assessee failed to establish eligibility for immunity under section 270AA(3) because no application in Form 68-online or manual-was produced or acknowledged; alleged technical glitch was unsubstantiated. The reasoning applies the requirement that an immunity application must be filed and evidenced, and that absence of Form 68 or acknowledgment supports a finding of under reporting. Consequent to these factual and evidentiary findings, penalty liability under section 270A was sustained and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.