Misdeclaration of quantity rejected where supplier evidence established counting errors, so reassessment, confiscation and redemption fine were set as...
Admissibility of electronic evidence controls valuation and penalty exposure; non compliant e records and statements nullify revaluation and penalties...
Addition under section 69 raised on a protective basis was set aside where seized third party material and statements did not explicitly prove cash 'on money' payments and the assessee denied such payments; ITAT held that reliance on limited third party evidence without corroboration is insufficient to attribute payments to the assessee. The tribunal also noted that a substantive addition against the closely connected brother had been deleted on merits by the first appellate authority, and therefore the protective addition against the assessee could not survive; appeal allowed.
Addition under section 69 raised on a protective basis was set aside where seized third party material and statements did not explicitly prove cash 'on money' payments and the assessee denied such payments; ITAT held that reliance on limited third party evidence without corroboration is insufficient to attribute payments to the assessee. The tribunal also noted that a substantive addition against the closely connected brother had been deleted on merits by the first appellate authority, and therefore the protective addition against the assessee could not survive; appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.