<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Uncorroborated third party evidence cannot sustain a protective addition for alleged cash on money; appeal allowed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97157</link>
    <description>Addition under section 69 raised on a protective basis was set aside where seized third party material and statements did not explicitly prove cash &#039;on money&#039; payments and the assessee denied such payments; ITAT held that reliance on limited third party evidence without corroboration is insufficient to attribute payments to the assessee. The tribunal also noted that a substantive addition against the closely connected brother had been deleted on merits by the first appellate authority, and therefore the protective addition against the assessee could not survive; appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 11:52:16 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 11:52:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=887900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Uncorroborated third party evidence cannot sustain a protective addition for alleged cash on money; appeal allowed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97157</link>
      <description>Addition under section 69 raised on a protective basis was set aside where seized third party material and statements did not explicitly prove cash &#039;on money&#039; payments and the assessee denied such payments; ITAT held that reliance on limited third party evidence without corroboration is insufficient to attribute payments to the assessee. The tribunal also noted that a substantive addition against the closely connected brother had been deleted on merits by the first appellate authority, and therefore the protective addition against the assessee could not survive; appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 11:52:16 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97157</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>