Jurisdictional validity: notice issued by a non jurisdictional officer invalidates reassessment where no formal transfer or independent verification o...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5581 to 5600 of 96176 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addition under section 69 raised on a protective basis was set aside where seized third party material and statements did not explicitly prove cash 'on money' payments and the assessee denied such payments; ITAT held that reliance on limited third party evidence without corroboration is insufficient to attribute payments to the assessee. The tribunal also noted that a substantive addition against the closely connected brother had been deleted on merits by the first appellate authority, and therefore the protective addition against the assessee could not survive; appeal allowed.
Addition under section 69 raised on a protective basis was set aside where seized third party material and statements did not explicitly prove cash 'on money' payments and the assessee denied such payments; ITAT held that reliance on limited third party evidence without corroboration is insufficient to attribute payments to the assessee. The tribunal also noted that a substantive addition against the closely connected brother had been deleted on merits by the first appellate authority, and therefore the protective addition against the assessee could not survive; appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.