Depreciation and routine compliance expenses disallowance did not prove inaccurate particulars or misreporting; penalty sustained only on foreign trav...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3481 to 3500 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addition under section 69 raised on a protective basis was set aside where seized third party material and statements did not explicitly prove cash 'on money' payments and the assessee denied such payments; ITAT held that reliance on limited third party evidence without corroboration is insufficient to attribute payments to the assessee. The tribunal also noted that a substantive addition against the closely connected brother had been deleted on merits by the first appellate authority, and therefore the protective addition against the assessee could not survive; appeal allowed.
Addition under section 69 raised on a protective basis was set aside where seized third party material and statements did not explicitly prove cash 'on money' payments and the assessee denied such payments; ITAT held that reliance on limited third party evidence without corroboration is insufficient to attribute payments to the assessee. The tribunal also noted that a substantive addition against the closely connected brother had been deleted on merits by the first appellate authority, and therefore the protective addition against the assessee could not survive; appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
