Concessional Basic Customs Duty on Ethernet switches: classification as enterprise switches upheld, challenge dismissed for lack of substantial law qu...
Insolvency petition based on admitted debt and default upheld; challenge for malicious initiation rejected, settlement may proceed under resolution fr...
Quashing of FIR and challenge to ECIR over alleged diversion of funds and preferential ESOP pricing dismissed after prima facie money-laundering findi...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6581 to 6600 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Extended period of limitation for duty recovery requires...
Extended limitation requires willful misstatement or suppression with intent to evade; mere misclassification does not sustain confiscation or penalty.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Extended period of limitation for duty recovery requires non-payment or short-payment to result from collusion or willful misstatement or active suppression by the importer with intent to evade; mere mis classification or omission during self assessment does not suffice. Applying that principle, the action invoking extended limitation was unsupported and so was the penalty founded on the same elements. Misclassification in the bill of entry does not justify confiscation of the goods or a redemption fine where the discrepancy concerns tariff classification rather than the nature of the goods. The demand for duty with interest was sustained only within the normal limitation period.
Extended period of limitation for duty recovery requires non-payment or short-payment to result from collusion or willful misstatement or active suppression by the importer with intent to evade; mere mis classification or omission during self assessment does not suffice. Applying that principle, the action invoking extended limitation was unsupported and so was the penalty founded on the same elements. Misclassification in the bill of entry does not justify confiscation of the goods or a redemption fine where the discrepancy concerns tariff classification rather than the nature of the goods. The demand for duty with interest was sustained only within the normal limitation period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.