<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Extended limitation requires willful misstatement or suppression with intent to evade; mere misclassification does not sustain confiscation or penalty.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97151</link>
    <description>Extended period of limitation for duty recovery requires non-payment or short-payment to result from collusion or willful misstatement or active suppression by the importer with intent to evade; mere mis classification or omission during self assessment does not suffice. Applying that principle, the action invoking extended limitation was unsupported and so was the penalty founded on the same elements. Misclassification in the bill of entry does not justify confiscation of the goods or a redemption fine where the discrepancy concerns tariff classification rather than the nature of the goods. The demand for duty with interest was sustained only within the normal limitation period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 11:47:54 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 11:47:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=887894" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Extended limitation requires willful misstatement or suppression with intent to evade; mere misclassification does not sustain confiscation or penalty.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97151</link>
      <description>Extended period of limitation for duty recovery requires non-payment or short-payment to result from collusion or willful misstatement or active suppression by the importer with intent to evade; mere mis classification or omission during self assessment does not suffice. Applying that principle, the action invoking extended limitation was unsupported and so was the penalty founded on the same elements. Misclassification in the bill of entry does not justify confiscation of the goods or a redemption fine where the discrepancy concerns tariff classification rather than the nature of the goods. The demand for duty with interest was sustained only within the normal limitation period.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 11:47:54 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>