Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4823
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4301 to 4320 of 96456 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Transfer of an immovable residential property under a redevelopment agreement constituted a transfer of a capital asset in kind where the owners received constructed floors, an undivided share of land and cash. The ruling applies the principle that indexed cost of acquisition/construction is allowable over the entire transferred property and cannot be confined to the fractional undivided share corresponding to constructed area. The owners were held eligible for the deduction for reinvestment in residential property despite one floor being allotted to the developer; the assessing officer's disallowance of indexation was deleted and the officer directed to verify computation of the deduction.
Transfer of an immovable residential property under a redevelopment agreement constituted a transfer of a capital asset in kind where the owners received constructed floors, an undivided share of land and cash. The ruling applies the principle that indexed cost of acquisition/construction is allowable over the entire transferred property and cannot be confined to the fractional undivided share corresponding to constructed area. The owners were held eligible for the deduction for reinvestment in residential property despite one floor being allotted to the developer; the assessing officer's disallowance of indexation was deleted and the officer directed to verify computation of the deduction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
