Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Transfer of an immovable residential property under a redevelopment agreement constituted a transfer of a capital asset in kind where the owners received constructed floors, an undivided share of land and cash. The ruling applies the principle that indexed cost of acquisition/construction is allowable over the entire transferred property and cannot be confined to the fractional undivided share corresponding to constructed area. The owners were held eligible for the deduction for reinvestment in residential property despite one floor being allotted to the developer; the assessing officer's disallowance of indexation was deleted and the officer directed to verify computation of the deduction.
Transfer of an immovable residential property under a redevelopment agreement constituted a transfer of a capital asset in kind where the owners received constructed floors, an undivided share of land and cash. The ruling applies the principle that indexed cost of acquisition/construction is allowable over the entire transferred property and cannot be confined to the fractional undivided share corresponding to constructed area. The owners were held eligible for the deduction for reinvestment in residential property despite one floor being allotted to the developer; the assessing officer's disallowance of indexation was deleted and the officer directed to verify computation of the deduction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
