Validity of faceless assessment procedure challenged for jurisdictional AO intervention mid-remand, resulting in quashing of assessment for procedural...
Petitioners sought accommodation for videography of statement recordings and presence of counsel during summons in a GST summons inquiry, asserting genuine transactions, banked payments, and pending appeals by suppliers. The petitioner with serious illness sought humanitarian consideration; petitioners offered cooperation. The court accepted a limited, non precedential accommodation-permitting videography and humane treatment consistent with cooperation-and directed disposal on terms similar to a prior coordinate bench order, while noting the relief is exceptional and fact specific.
Petitioners sought accommodation for videography of statement recordings and presence of counsel during summons in a GST summons inquiry, asserting genuine transactions, banked payments, and pending appeals by suppliers. The petitioner with serious illness sought humanitarian consideration; petitioners offered cooperation. The court accepted a limited, non precedential accommodation-permitting videography and humane treatment consistent with cooperation-and directed disposal on terms similar to a prior coordinate bench order, while noting the relief is exceptional and fact specific.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.