Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in proceedings pursuant to a summons under Section 70 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, the person whose statement is being recorded may have the statement video recorded at the petitioner's cost and may be accompanied by an advocate who may sit at a visible but not audible distance without interfering with the recording.
Analysis: The summons inquiry relates to input tax credit claimed and is conducted under Section 70 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner has expressed willingness to cooperate with the inquiry and sought limited safeguards: (i) video recording of the statement at the petitioner's cost; and (ii) allowing an advocate to accompany the witness, to sit at a visible but not audible distance and not to interfere with or disturb the recording. The petitioners also relied on an order of a Co-ordinate Bench providing similar directions. Considering the nature of the inquiry, the stated willingness to cooperate, and the petitioner's medical condition requiring humanitarian consideration, granting these limited safeguards suitably balances investigative needs and the petitioner's rights.
Conclusion: The petition is allowed to the limited extent that (i) the statement of the person summoned shall be video recorded at the cost of the petitioners; and (ii) an advocate may accompany the person during recording but shall not interfere, interrupt or disturb the recording and shall sit at a visible but not audible distance.