Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1201 to 1220 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Tribunal considered whether Route Navigation Facility Charges (RNFC) and Terminal Navigation Landing Charges (TNLC) are taxable services under sub-clause (zzm) of section 65(105). It held RNFC is not exigible because the service is rendered en route across the route and not confined to the airport/civil enclave, so service tax does not apply. It held TNLC exigible because the service is provided during the landing phase within the airport/civil enclave and charged per aircraft. Miscellaneous receipts were found not to be provision of service and demands under that head were set aside. The show cause notice was held within the limitation period.
The Tribunal considered whether Route Navigation Facility Charges (RNFC) and Terminal Navigation Landing Charges (TNLC) are taxable services under sub-clause (zzm) of section 65(105). It held RNFC is not exigible because the service is rendered en route across the route and not confined to the airport/civil enclave, so service tax does not apply. It held TNLC exigible because the service is provided during the landing phase within the airport/civil enclave and charged per aircraft. Miscellaneous receipts were found not to be provision of service and demands under that head were set aside. The show cause notice was held within the limitation period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.