Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
The Tribunal considered whether Route Navigation Facility Charges (RNFC) and Terminal Navigation Landing Charges (TNLC) are taxable services under sub-clause (zzm) of section 65(105). It held RNFC is not exigible because the service is rendered en route across the route and not confined to the airport/civil enclave, so service tax does not apply. It held TNLC exigible because the service is provided during the landing phase within the airport/civil enclave and charged per aircraft. Miscellaneous receipts were found not to be provision of service and demands under that head were set aside. The show cause notice was held within the limitation period.
The Tribunal considered whether Route Navigation Facility Charges (RNFC) and Terminal Navigation Landing Charges (TNLC) are taxable services under sub-clause (zzm) of section 65(105). It held RNFC is not exigible because the service is rendered en route across the route and not confined to the airport/civil enclave, so service tax does not apply. It held TNLC exigible because the service is provided during the landing phase within the airport/civil enclave and charged per aircraft. Miscellaneous receipts were found not to be provision of service and demands under that head were set aside. The show cause notice was held within the limitation period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
