Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
361 to 380 of 96208 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Tribunal considered whether Route Navigation Facility Charges (RNFC) and Terminal Navigation Landing Charges (TNLC) are taxable services under sub-clause (zzm) of section 65(105). It held RNFC is not exigible because the service is rendered en route across the route and not confined to the airport/civil enclave, so service tax does not apply. It held TNLC exigible because the service is provided during the landing phase within the airport/civil enclave and charged per aircraft. Miscellaneous receipts were found not to be provision of service and demands under that head were set aside. The show cause notice was held within the limitation period.
The Tribunal considered whether Route Navigation Facility Charges (RNFC) and Terminal Navigation Landing Charges (TNLC) are taxable services under sub-clause (zzm) of section 65(105). It held RNFC is not exigible because the service is rendered en route across the route and not confined to the airport/civil enclave, so service tax does not apply. It held TNLC exigible because the service is provided during the landing phase within the airport/civil enclave and charged per aircraft. Miscellaneous receipts were found not to be provision of service and demands under that head were set aside. The show cause notice was held within the limitation period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
