Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Violation of natural justice by non-issuance of intimation in Form GST DRC-01A under amended Rule 142(1A) was examined through the prejudice test: since Rule 142(1A) does not mandate a 'period' and the petitioner failed to demonstrate any actual prejudice from non-issuance, the impugned show-cause notice and Order-in-Original were not set aside. The court treated the New Morning Star Travels decision as sub silentio on prejudice, affirmed availability of efficacious statutory remedy of appeal, and declined to exercise discretionary writ jurisdiction, dismissing the petition.
Violation of natural justice by non-issuance of intimation in Form GST DRC-01A under amended Rule 142(1A) was examined through the prejudice test: since Rule 142(1A) does not mandate a 'period' and the petitioner failed to demonstrate any actual prejudice from non-issuance, the impugned show-cause notice and Order-in-Original were not set aside. The court treated the New Morning Star Travels decision as sub silentio on prejudice, affirmed availability of efficacious statutory remedy of appeal, and declined to exercise discretionary writ jurisdiction, dismissing the petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
