https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96907 Violation of natural justice by non-issuance of intimation in Form GST DRC-01A under amended Rule 142(1A) was examined through the prejudice test: since Rule 142(1A) does not mandate a 'period' and the petitioner failed to demonstrate any actual prejudice from non-issuance, the impugned show-cause notice and Order-in-Original were not set aside. The court treated the New Morning Star Travels decision as sub silentio on prejudice, affirmed availability of efficacious statutory remedy of appeal, and declined to exercise discretionary writ jurisdiction, dismissing the petition. en-us Sat, 14 Feb 2026 08:29:35 +0530 Sat, 14 Feb 2026 08:29:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96907 Violation of natural justice by non-issuance of intimation in Form GST DRC-01A under amended Rule 142(1A) was examined through the prejudice test: since Rule 142(1A) does not mandate a 'period' and the petitioner failed to demonstrate any actual prejudice from non-issuance, the impugned show-cause notice and Order-in-Original were not set aside. The court treated the New Morning Star Travels decision as sub silentio on prejudice, affirmed availability of efficacious statutory remedy of appeal, and declined to exercise discretionary writ jurisdiction, dismissing the petition. Highlights GST Sat, 14 Feb 2026 08:29:35 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96907