Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Violation of natural justice by non-issuance of intimation in Form GST DRC-01A under amended Rule 142(1A) was examined through the prejudice test: since Rule 142(1A) does not mandate a 'period' and the petitioner failed to demonstrate any actual prejudice from non-issuance, the impugned show-cause notice and Order-in-Original were not set aside. The court treated the New Morning Star Travels decision as sub silentio on prejudice, affirmed availability of efficacious statutory remedy of appeal, and declined to exercise discretionary writ jurisdiction, dismissing the petition.
Violation of natural justice by non-issuance of intimation in Form GST DRC-01A under amended Rule 142(1A) was examined through the prejudice test: since Rule 142(1A) does not mandate a 'period' and the petitioner failed to demonstrate any actual prejudice from non-issuance, the impugned show-cause notice and Order-in-Original were not set aside. The court treated the New Morning Star Travels decision as sub silentio on prejudice, affirmed availability of efficacious statutory remedy of appeal, and declined to exercise discretionary writ jurisdiction, dismissing the petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
