Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Reassessment under section 147/148 was quashed because applying the Assessing Officer's own gross profit rate (13.85%) produced alleged escaped income of Rs.48,09,503, below the statutory monetary threshold of Rs.50,00,000 under section 149(1)(b), and "income chargeable to tax which has escaped assessment" refers to real income, not gross transaction value. On merits, the assessee produced primary documents and bank payment evidence which AO did not independently test; books were not rejected under section 145(3), and a separate addition would duplicate profit already reflected in returned income. Appeal allowed by ITAT.
Reassessment under section 147/148 was quashed because applying the Assessing Officer's own gross profit rate (13.85%) produced alleged escaped income of Rs.48,09,503, below the statutory monetary threshold of Rs.50,00,000 under section 149(1)(b), and "income chargeable to tax which has escaped assessment" refers to real income, not gross transaction value. On merits, the assessee produced primary documents and bank payment evidence which AO did not independently test; books were not rejected under section 145(3), and a separate addition would duplicate profit already reflected in returned income. Appeal allowed by ITAT.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
