International transaction characterisation of domestic divestment of support services business rejected; transaction between resident associated enter...
Minimum Import Price restrictions for Black Pepper, Areca-nuts and Apples upheld; procedural laying failure not fatal, notifications to be placed befo...
Transaction value between related persons requires market-equivalent pricing; importer must prove declared value mirrors ordinary international trade ...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6841 to 6860 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Admissibility of investigation statements recorded during...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalty.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Admissibility of investigation statements recorded during inquiry is conditional: when statements under section 108 (Customs) are not admissible under the primary clause, they become relevant only if the declarants are examined as witnesses before the adjudicating authority, the authority forms an opinion to admit them, and cross examination is afforded; these procedural safeguards in section 138B(1)(b) (and counterpart section 9D(1)(b) in Central Excise) are mandatory. Failure to comply bars reliance on such statements; accordingly, a penalty imposed solely on an unvalidated section 108 statement was set aside and the appeal allowed.
Admissibility of investigation statements recorded during inquiry is conditional: when statements under section 108 (Customs) are not admissible under the primary clause, they become relevant only if the declarants are examined as witnesses before the adjudicating authority, the authority forms an opinion to admit them, and cross examination is afforded; these procedural safeguards in section 138B(1)(b) (and counterpart section 9D(1)(b) in Central Excise) are mandatory. Failure to comply bars reliance on such statements; accordingly, a penalty imposed solely on an unvalidated section 108 statement was set aside and the appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.